Comments on: Mock Draft-1st Round: 2/4/09

By: davedallasfan

davedallasfan — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:08:17 +0000

i, still would not take a wr in the first round. i don’t think the impact that a wr has in their first 2 years in the league warrant a first round pick. very, very few wrs hit on their first year in the league. it is a position that takes time to develop. the first 2 rounds, this day and age, requires the impact, imeidiate starter. better suited for a D-player, rb, or franchise qb that you can afford to let set and learn, MAYBE? but not a wr. history proves that this theroey might be right?

By: davedallasfan

davedallasfan — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:59:06 +0000

hey chauncey, or henry, or hank for that matter. i said don’t take a wr in the first round, yes. i said you guys should’nt waste your first round pick on a wr. i said that it usually takes 3 years for one to develop a nfl wr, so you can find good talent at the position in later rounds. taking one in the first is usually a waste? you guys will need D help with the free agents you’ll potentially will loose? make sense now? what i meant was that with crabtree available with the #3 pick, that no way does KC let him go by with haley as their new coach. he will want an offense similar to what he had in arizona? i’m not saying that i think it is right, i just said taking one in the first is not what i believe is right. but that does’nt mean a coach like haley agrees with me? this is my opinion on what i believe KC does, and what you guys should do? sorry for the mix up.

By: Joe B

Joe B — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:54:15 +0000

I like your style HG