Ravens predicted to chase new Diontae Johnson-sized headache they don’t need

It's important to learn from past mistakes.

Miami Dolphins v Baltimore Ravens
Miami Dolphins v Baltimore Ravens | Rob Carr/GettyImages

The Baltimore Ravens are in a golden age offensively. Lamar Jackson has been fully unleashed under Todd Monken, running an offense that shows no tangible problems. Receivers Zay Flowers and Rashod Bateman have emerged as playmakers, Derrick Henry is doing Derrick Henry things, and Mark Andrews remains one of the NFL’s best tight ends.

This offensive juggernaut has been a revelation after years of being unfairly labeled as "one-dimensional." Monken’s scheme has transformed Baltimore into one of the most versatile and unpredictable attacks in the league.

And with the team thriving as a collective unit, the Ravens have reached a point where the offense isn’t just functional—it’s a problem for anyone who has to stop it.

So, when Bleacher Report’s Maurice Moton floated the idea of trading for Miami Dolphins wide receiver Tyreek Hill this offseason, you can understand why some fans raised their eyebrows. Hill is a game-changer, no question, but the Ravens don’t need him. In fact, making such a move could disrupt the very balance that has made Baltimore so dangerous.

Tyreek Hill isn't the answer

Let’s not sugarcoat it: Hill is better than Zay Flowers and Rashod Bateman. He’s one of the most dynamic receivers of his generation, and even in a "down" year, he still posted 81 catches for 959 yards and six touchdowns. The man is electric.

Moton spoke about the offensive potential: "If the Ravens open the 2025 season with Lamar Jackson, Derrick Henry and Hill, they would have arguably the league's best quarterback-tailback-receiver trio."

While the on-paper portion of the trade looks tantalizing, the Ravens have learned talent alone will only get them so far.

But here’s the thing: Baltimore’s offense doesn’t need more electricity—it needs reliability and balance. Hill’s talent isn’t in question, but his history of needing a starring role raises red flags. Does he become a distraction if he’s not getting the touches and personal stats he craves? It’s not an unreasonable concern. Remember, this team just dealt with the Diontae Johnson debacle—a talented receiver whose attitude and complaints about playing time got him shipped out faster than a hot crab cake at a Baltimore seafood festival.

The Ravens just had a front-row seat to the chaos a frustrated teammate can bring to a locker room. While players might say it didn’t distract them, the endless media buzz and the sideshow that followed were nothing but a waste of time.

With Lamar Jackson, Derrick Henry, Flowers, Bateman, and Mark Andrews already sharing touches, there’s no guarantee Hill will get the volume he wants. Baltimore thrives on a team-first mentality, and disrupting that chemistry for one player, no matter how talented, doesn’t feel like a Ravens move.

Trading a second-round pick for Hill isn’t ridiculous, but there are smarter ways to build. Baltimore could pursue veteran receivers on struggling teams or explore free agents like DeAndre Hopkins or Marquise Brown. Even rookie Devontez Walker could take a leap with a strong offseason.

The Ravens have proven they don’t need to chase superstars to succeed. They’ve built one of the NFL’s most potent offenses with unselfish, complementary players who buy into the system. Tyreek Hill might make headlines, but Baltimore is built for Lombardi trophies, not off-season hype.

While the idea is interesting, it's not what the Ravens need. Let someone else deal with the potential drama. The Ravens are sticking with what works—and what works is already championship-caliber.

More Baltimore Ravens news and analysis

Schedule